Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Which is Better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 Instant (OpenAI) are both frontier-class models competing for the same developer and enterprise audience in 2026. This page compiles benchmarks, task grades, and practical guidance to help you decide which model fits your workflow.
Last updated: October 2, 2026
Note: GPT-5.5 Instant is no longer offered through OpenAI's API — it has been retired from the live leaderboard. Scores below are kept for reference.
Quick Verdict
Across the benchmarks where both models have published scores, Claude Opus 4.7 leads on 4 of 4 shared evaluation tasks. GPT-5.5 Instant remains competitive, particularly in areas aligned with its training focus. For general-purpose quality, Claude Opus 4.7 currently holds an edge — but the right choice depends heavily on your specific use case, budget, and whether you need API access or self-hosted deployment.
Side-by-Side Comparison
The table below covers every benchmark for which at least one model has a published score. Higher scores are better on all metrics except where noted. Bold values indicate the higher score in each row.
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 Instant | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.2 | 82.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6 | — | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Arena Elo (Text) | 1490 | 1419 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Arena Elo (WebDev) | 1557 | — | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Arena Elo (Vision) | 1317 | 1251 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| AIME 2024–25 (Epoch AI) | 97.8 | 68.1 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2 | — | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7 | — | Claude Opus 4.7 |
Task Performance
Per-task grades are sourced from the id8 LLM leaderboard evaluations. Each grade reflects observed output quality across real-world prompts in that category. A dash (—) means grades are not yet published for that model.
| Task | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | S | S |
| Math | S | S |
| Content Writing | S | S |
| Reasoning | S | S |
| Studying | S | S |
| Chat / Conversation | S | S |
| Summarization | S | S |
| Agents / Tool Use | S | S |
| Vision / Multimodal | B | S |
| Data Analysis | S | S |
| Hindi / Multilingual | B | B |
| Interview Prep | S | S |
| overall | S | S |
Grade scale: S = Exceptional A = Strong B = Good C = Fair D = Weak
Key Differences
- Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-5.5 Instant comes from OpenAI — both are closed-source API models, so pricing and rate limits are set by their respective providers.
- For graduate-level science and reasoning (GPQA Diamond), Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 94.2%, indicating stronger performance on expert-level knowledge tasks.
- Claude Opus 4.7 earns an S-grade (exceptional) in: overall, Coding, Math — making it the top choice for those workflows.
- GPT-5.5 Instant earns an S-grade in: overall, Coding, Math.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if your primary use cases involve overall, Coding, Math. Claude Opus 4.7 scores highly on these tasks and is especially well-suited for teams that need consistent, high-quality outputs at scale through Anthropic's API.
Choose GPT-5.5 Instant if your work centres on overall, Coding, Math. It offers a strong value proposition for those use cases.
Still unsure? The LLM Leaderboard lets you sort and filter models by benchmark — useful for narrowing down the right model for a specific workload.
Explore Further
Use these tools to dig deeper into either model's hardware requirements and leaderboard ranking.
Related Comparisons
Related Tools